Skip to main content

What's in a name (part 2): RUCKSACK it is!

That's right. We're going with Rucksack after all!

This is (mildly) embarrassing. The best of the bad explanations I can offer is, it takes a lot of time to get ready to kill one company and start another one, even very small companies. In the process of doing my company-name research, I failed to notice that 37Signals had, some months ago, released an iPhone app called "Daypack." Sigh.

I am pretty sure I could have stuck with Daypack Data and never heard from 37Signals' lawyers. We don't compete at all. But it's okay. While "Daypack" is great as a name for an iPhone app, I always thought it was a bit lightweight for what we do anyway. As I said five weeks ago ("What's in a name?"), the connotations of rucksack are much sturdier. That's a better fit with our mission. We don't just build databases you can carry your lunch in, we build databases that will carry everything you need to succeed in battle. So to speak.

And I rethought the word "data." We don't sell data and we don't do data processing. We're a technology solution firm, selling tools that allow you to manage and process your own data. So "Technology" is a better description of our field. Plus, we're in Texas. So "Texnology" seems like a clever secondary descriptor.


How do you pronounce it? I actually don't expect people to say it out loud very often, but I hereby declare that the correct, proper and officially sanctioned pronunciation is "TEK-nology" (not "TEX-").

That third letter is the Greek letter chi (khi), which gets transliterated in English as "ch" or "kh". It is in fact the character used in the word tekhnos "craft" which is the root in "technology".


This use of "tex" for "tech" is not at all original. If you're a typesetter you probably are familiar with TeX, the typesetting language, or LaTeX, the typesetting program. They are pronounced tek and latek respectively.

The fact that "tex" makes you think of the great Lone Star State is, well, just a bonus.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Virtual List Basics

The conceptThe basic trick behind virtual lists is the wonderful GetValue() function. GetValue() takes two parameters: A list of return-delimited values A number specifying which value in the list to get

For example say you have a field in a single record called “List of Values” and it contains the following:

   Apple
   Boy
   Cat
   Doorknob
   Elephant
   Fish
When that record is selected, GetValue ( MYTABLE::List of Values ; 4 ) will return “Doorknob”.

The brilliant idea is to replace the list of values stored in a field with a list in a global variable.

The basic implementation, part oneCreate a table called VIRTUALLIST. In it, define these two fields: VALUE NUMBER: a number field Value_calc: calc field returning text value, = “GetValue ( $$VALUES; VALUENUMBER )”. Make sure that this value is an unstored calculation.

Go to the layout for the VIRTUALLIST table and create some records. Later you can create hundreds or thousands, but right now just ten will do. Use ReplaceFieldContents to po…

Getting out of fullscreen mode in FileMaker Pro

In version 2 of Acquittal, our criminal defense case management app, we're doing some nifty stuff with windows, and that means we're finding out that even in FileMaker Pro 15, we still don't have quite all the tools we'd like for managing windows.  One problem is how to trap for the possibility that the user has switched into fullscreen mode. The other problem is how to get out of it.


Is this window in fullscreen mode?
This one's not too hard. This calc formula seems to do the trick:

Get ( WindowHeight ) = Get ( ScreenHeight ) and
Get ( WindowWidth ) = Get ( ScreenWidth)

That will return true if the window is in fullscreen mode, false if it's not.

Why does this matter? Because there are certain things that you can't do with a window if it's in fullscreen mode. In Acquittal, for example, there are times when we want to generate a second "sidecar" window, then display the main and sidecar windows side-by-side. Can't do it if the main window …

More about why I like the new navigation part in FileMaker Pro 14

I myself didn't completely "get" the navigation layout part at first. In this post I want to clarify a few things about the benefits of this new feature.

The new navigation layout part in FileMaker Pro 14 and FileMaker Pro 14 Advanced differs in two significant ways from the header/footer parts we've had since forever (and which we still have in 14):

Navigation parts don't zoomNavigation parts don't scroll out of sight
Well, it's a little messier than that, in reality. Let me elaborate on the messiness of it first, since the messiness may have some impact on why navigation parts took me a day or two to "get".

First potential confusion: objects in navigation parts don't zoom, but they are not completely inflexible. If you grab the edge of the window and make the window wider (I'm not talking about zooming the content, I'm talking about actually enlarging the window) then any objects in a navigation part that are anchored to both sides …